Your Trusted West Virginia Product Liability Lawyers
Manufacturing, Design, and Marketing Defects
Depending on the sort of defect, a victim of a faulty product should seek legal advice from product liability attorneys as they may have grounds to sue the manufacturer, wholesaler, or distributor and recover compensation. Design errors, and manufacturing flaws are the two most common types of product faults for defective or dangerous products under federal law.
Manufacturing defects
These are a result of a manufacturing mistake and should not be included in the product. This sort of flaw is unusual to appear in more than a tiny fraction of a company’s products. Regardless of whether the manufacturer took appropriate precautions throughout the manufacturing process, they are responsible for any manufacturing faults that occur as a consequence of faulty construction, under the notion of “strict liability”.
Free Case Consultation
Fill out the form below to receive your Free Case Consultation. We will be in contact within 24 hours of your submission.
Design defect
A design flaw is an error in the original plan of a product that makes it hazardous and exposes future users to danger. This sort of fault will likely be present in all of the company’s manufactured goods. The following questions are used to determine whether a design defect exists: Prior to production, was the product’s design irresponsibly dangerous? Was it reasonable to believe that the product’s design might harm a potential user? Could the manufacturer have utilized an improved design that was both cost-effective and would not affect the product’s purpose and prevent it from being a dangerous or defective product?
If any of these inquiries have a yes, the harmed party may have grounds for a defective products claim and should contact one of our personal injury lawyers as soon as possible.
Contact Us Today!
Failure to Warn
A product strict liability claim can also be filed if a manufacturer fails to disclose any potential dangers. If warnings or instructions could have avoided injury from foreseeable risks and/or if the warnings themselves, when properly implemented, caused the damage, any link in the distribution chain may be held responsible.
Warning Labels
In 2002, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), which is in charge of standardizing safety labels and signs and labels for products, made significant changes to their warning label guidelines. The new standards call for clearer signs that provide a more complete explanation and depict the dangers with images.
According to the ANSI standard, a warning sign should:
- Let the client know about any dangers he or she may encounter.
- Provide the consumer with information on the seriousness of the product’s potential risks.
- Tell the customer about the consequences of the hazard.
- Informing the customer about the danger
The label should be as noticeable as possible and positioned as near to the danger zone as feasible. Life expectancy and ordinary setting of the product should be considered when creating the label. To assess the hazard’s severity, ANSI has assigned three color-coded keywords: green, yellow, and red.
- A red warning signal (Danger) – an impending dangerous condition that will result in significant harm or death.
- A serious warning (orange) – a potentially fatal or damaging situation that may result in catastrophic injury or death.
- Caution (yellow) – a potentially hazardous situation that might result in minor or moderate damage.
To improve visibility, one of these terms, as well as the hazard description, should be printed on a square white background. The portion of the label allocated to the description should be divided into two panels, including a symbol or graphics section (e.g., red circle with a slash through a picture of an act of carelessness) and a message
If a warning label is not sufficient, it’s worth asking why.
- What were the product’s intended uses and did they suggest it was safe to use?
- Was the product being utilized as intended?
- How much damage did it cause?
- What sort of knowledge does the manufacturer think the user has? (The degree of responsibility to inform varies with the product’s complexity.)
- What was the label’s reliance on the user’s experience and knowledge?
- Was the notice simple and straightforward enough to comprehend?
Types of Product Liability Lawsuits
There are three different sorts of product liability lawsuit in product liability law.
Negligence: The claimant must show that the product’s design or manufacture was careless, causing his or her injuries. The injured individual must first show that the defendant had a duty to sell a safe product. The client then has to demonstrate that the defendant breached this obligation. If the plaintiff can show that the defective goods caused their harm, he or she is entitled to seek compensation.
There are numerous aspects of product development in which carelessness may occur, including, but not limited to:
- Drawing up or revisiting product plans is an important element of any company’s marketing plan.
- Maintaining equipment that produce numerous components of the product
- Failing to anticipate ways in which the product might be used
- Failing to examine or test the goods adequately
- To make things worse, the product was subsequently released to the general public far too quickly.
Strict Liability: In general, products liability claims are brought under the theory of strict liability. The injured party in these instances need only to show that a product has a flaw and that an accident occurred as a result of it. If a fault exists, the manufacturer may be held strictly liable for any resulting losses, regardless of whether they exercised great care. The product must have been purchased in the chain of distribution for strict liability to apply. Secondhand goods are not qualified for strict liability claims.
The Express and Implied Warranties: When a product is sold, the buyer relies on two warranties: the express warranty and the implied warranty.
- Express Warranty: Any statement regarding the product’s safety or functionality made by the manufacturer or seller.
- Implied Warranty: The manufacturer’s promise (or other liable party) that the product, if utilized as intended, will not cause any injury.
Any person who is reasonably anticipated to use the product and has suffered damages as a result of a breach of warranty may bring an action for breach of express or implied warranty. TKC Law honors the attorney client relationship and has the best product liability lawyer West Virginia has to offer!
